Every month the list of the top 50 Biblioblogs on the web gets published.
Here are the top 10 for January 2011:
Rank | Blogger | Blog Name | |
1 | Jim West | Zwinglius Redivivus | |
2 | Joel L. Watts | Unsettled Christianity | |
3 | Brian LePort | Near Emmaus: Christ and Text | |
4 | Marc Cortez | Scientia et Sapientia | |
5 | Matt & Madeleine Flannagan | MandM | |
6 | James McGrath | Exploring Our Matrix | |
7 | John Loftus | Debunking Christianity | |
8 | Jeremy Thompson | Free Old Testament Audio | |
9 | JR Daniel Kirk | Storied Theology | |
10 |
Rod Thomas & Chad Pressley |
|
The other top 40 are here.
Tags: Biblioblog · Blog Rankings9 Comments
The Biblioblog list ranks biblically themed blogs by their one month Alexa score, so if you wish to help your favourite blog rank better visit it regularly with the Alexa toolbar installed; SEO Black Hat explains why you should install it:
Food for thought.
I just had a look at #1 on the list (Zwinglius Redivivus) and I’m skeptical about validity of the Biblioblog/Alexa ranking system.
Oh, and that SEO Black Hat article is from 2005. Six years is a very long time in SEO. I very much doubt that Google is as influenced by Alexa as the article claims.
Nice going, guys! Maybe one day Disciple Dojo will crack the top 50! 🙂
Alexa’s data is skewed, it relies heavily on a small sample set and weight that group’s data far too strongly – everyone concedes that – but this factor is precisely why having the toolbar gives you real power.
My experience of using Alexa has been extremely positive for the sites I frequent – it is amazing what just one extra person visiting a site regularly can do for that site’s Alexa rankings.
Google’s Page Rank has this blog at 6/10, Zwinglius Redivivus at 5/10 and Beretta at 3/10. I’d say that that reflects the truth of the popularity of the sites better than Alexa. Although going by the comment traffic alone I’d put Glenn’s blog between Zwinglius Redivivus and you.
I think that article from 2005 is wrong (or out of date) in saying that “Page Rank is completely useless”. Seems closer to the truth than Alexa’s figures.
Perhaps Jim simply spends more time surfing his own site with the Alexa toolbar? Useful stats if you want to know who surfs their own website the most. ;p
Page rank is more a measure of how carefully constructed internally a site is, which in turn affects how important google ranks its pages. I know for a fact that I put a lot more effort into building MandM’s page rank than Glenn or Jim do their sites – that is why our page rank is on par with Kiwiblog.
I have gone through 2/3 of this site to make it optimal for page rank analysis, my hope is that when I can get the remaining 1/3 done we’ll creep up to a 7.
The real measure of site is unique visits, time on site, number of pages loaded, backlinks and repeat visits. Page rank does not show this at all and while Alexa does its results are warped because of how few people use the toolbar.
MandM and Beretta’s (I think) stat counters are publicly visible so you can compare visits and page loads between those two sites if you want.
An interesting comparison between Zwinglius, Beretta and MandM would be to run the search link:www.inserturl.4each and compare the total number of links for each site. I’ve never done that.
Well done Matt and Madeleine.
I’m not sure where you aare gettiung your information,
buut good topic. I needs to spend some time leaqrning more or understandinng more.
Thanks for wonderful info I wass looking for this info for my mission.