MandM header image 5

Entries from July 20th, 2009

Taking a Break

July 20th, 2009 6 Comments

My grandfather died last night from complications following the flu. We are not in the headspace to post just now, our focus is on family but don’t feel like you have to stop commenting or anything. Back soon 🙂

Tags:

Sunday Study: Christ on The Prohibition on Homicide Part II

July 19th, 2009 10 Comments

This post is the second in my series on Christ’s exposition of the 6th Commandment, the prohibition on homicide, contained in the Sermon on the Mount in Matthew 5: 21-26. In Sunday Study: Christ on The Prohibition on Homicide Part I, I looked at what The Torah taught about homicide, in this post I will […]

Tags:   · ·

MandM featured on Vote No UPDATE 2

July 18th, 2009 2 Comments

The Vote No blog will be linking to some of our posts as the referendum on the illegality of smacking draws nearer. The first one, published today, was my piece attacking the argument that those accused of child abuse should not be permitted to attempt raising a defence. It is already drawing comments – feel […]

Tags:

Senator Jim Demint on the Proposed Hate Crimes Amendment

July 18th, 2009 16 Comments

Wintery Knight has posted the video below from a debate of Senator Jim Demint speaking on the proposed hate crimes amendment currently before the US Senate. I do not agree with all of the Senator’s arguments; the Senator seems to oppose the idea that some crimes or assaults are worse than others; however, having distinctions […]

Tags:  

Top 10 NZ Christian Blogs – May 09

July 18th, 2009 7 Comments

The Top 10 New Zealand Christian Blogs for May 09 are as follows: [1.] NZ Conservative 14.5 (7 – 22 ) [3.] MacDoctor Moments 19.5 (22 – 17) [2.] MandM 20 (5 – 35) [4.] Something Should Go Here, Maybe Later (HalfDone) 25.5 (20 – 31) [5.] Keeping Stock 32.5 (29 – 36) [6.] Say […]

Tags:  

Walter Sinnott-Armstrong on God, Morality and Arbitrariness

July 17th, 2009 21 Comments

Is morality independent of religion? One common argument for this position is that denying it makes God’s commands arbitrary. Walter Sinnott-Armstrong argues, Let’s assume that God commanded us not to rape. Did God have any reason to command this? If not, his command was arbitrary, and then it can’t make anything morally wrong. On the […]

Tags:   · · · · ·

Boonin’s Defense of the Sentience Criterion: A Critique Part II

July 16th, 2009 Comments Off on Boonin’s Defense of the Sentience Criterion: A Critique Part II

In Boonin’s Defense of the Sentience Criterion: A Critique Part I, I noted that a defender of the permissibility of feticide, who does not also want to endorse infanticide and who defends the sentience criterion, must “identify a reason for holding that the potential of a human brain is morally relevant after” the fetus acquires […]

Tags:   · · · · ·